| Home | Blog | Ask This | Showcase | Commentary | Comments | About Us | Contributors | Contact Us |
Contributions Job destroying taxes? Ask pols, which ones are those? COMMENTARY | June 170, 2012 Aren’t reporters tired of letting flannelmouthed politicians talk about ‘job destroying taxes’ without calling them on it? And on Obamacare – couldn’t the press, once in a while, point out that other values are at stake and get past dubious assertions about what the Constitution does or does not allow?  How many more crashes before we fix the economy? COMMENTARY | December 357, 2011 Some lessons were learned from the 2008 economic collapse but few reforms have been implemented; moneyed resistance is too powerful and stubborn. So a good question is: When will we fix the system? After the next crisis? The one after that? We sure aren’t fixing it now. The future of our economy depends on how well the media cover the tax debate COMMENTARY | September 270, 2011 Martin Lobel writes that special interests are defining the terms of a debate in which the economy is at stake. And he offers an extraordinary resource to reporters who want to understand taxation issues better. Remember 'too big to fail?' Want to see it again? COMMENTARY | May 147, 2011 Wall Street's sense of entitlement continues. The big banks and brokerages, seeing themselves immune to punishment and abetted by lax regulators, are on the road to another crash, writes Martin Lobel. He proposes this as the new free market rule: Only small businesses have the right to fail. If the Tea Party wins, who benefits? Not its members. COMMENTARY | May 126, 2011 Martin Lobel holds that the Tea Party rank and file, knowingly or not, are led around by the rich and powerful. That in the name of reform, their plans would make things worse, not better for most Americans, including themselves. That right-wing think tanks are calling the shots, and the press is pretty much missing the story. It’s time to do more than just say the economy is the No. 1 issue ASK THIS | September 245, 2010 If voters are to go into the midterm elections with any understanding at all, the press needs to get away from he-said, she-said reporting and look into the positions that candidates and the two parties are taking. Martin Lobel offers some vital questions. Cut tax expenditures to stimulate the economy COMMENTARY | July 208, 2010 Cutting the special subsidies in the tax code would go far toward eliminating the deficit and stimulating the economy. It’s a way of letting the market work without government interference. Sounds like Republicans might favor it, right? Wall Street reform is complicated, so why should the press even bother with it? COMMENTARY | May 133, 2010 Martin Lobel says that if the press doesn’t blow away the smokescreen covering Wall Street gambling – haughty, naked bets with taxpayer guarantees – then reform will fail. It’s that simple. Tax cuts are expenditures. Got that, reporters? ASK THIS | April 104, 2010 Tax cuts are expenditures that increase the deficit. That’s a simple fact but, writes Martin Lobel, it appears to have eluded many Republicans, and most in the news media, as well. Some remedies for the Supreme Court power grab COMMENTARY | January 26, 2010 It’s easy to find activism, impossible to find original intent behind the Roberts/Scalia group’s ruling on corporate political spending. Martin Lobel suggests six sharp, practical steps to deal with it. The case for taxing the very rich COMMENTARY | November 308, 2009 There's no real economic recovery while so many Americans remain jobless. A new stimulus could bring about full employment, write Martin Lobel and Lee Ellen Helfrich, but it would be expensive. One way to fund it would be to increase taxes on the very rich, and cut their tax loopholes. Needed: a new industrial policy that responds to things as they are now, not as they used to be COMMENTARY | October 295, 2009 ‘Efficient Market Theory’ failed; banks and big industry shared directors (and profits) and they failed. Nevertheless, writes Martin Lobel, until now the Obama administration has been more inclined to protect large financial institutions than to prevent a recurrence of failure. Why aren’t domestic corporations backing Obama on limiting offshore tax breaks? ASK THIS | May 127, 2009 The press needs to focus on basic questions, writes Martin Lobel. For example, how about exploring the relationship between campaign contributions and soft Congressional handling of corporate taxes? What next, after outrage? COMMENTARY | March 84, 2009 Top U.S. executives at the largest companies typically earn about 400 times as much as their average workers—and despite the economic meltdown, many of them still feel entitled. That’s outrageous, Martin Lobel writes, but few have questioned it until now, and it’s the press’s job to report how we got here and what needs to be done to prevent further meltdowns. Questions about nationalizing the banks ASK THIS | March 70, 2009 The U.S. government may be on the verge of nationalizing large banks. Two experts who anticipated America's financial collapse on this Web site as early as 2005, Martin Lobel and Henry M. Banta, propose basic questions reporters should ask about nationalization. A stimulus bill by any other name is...? ASK THIS | February 51, 2009 How to define the newly-enacted $785-billion bill? Is it a bailout bill? A jobs bill? Is it pork? Reporters and editors need to reject political spin and be precise because from day to day they will, in large degree, be defining the current economic debate. In the future, get information in time to prevent a crisis COMMENTARY | October 277, 2008 This is a job for serious experts. We’ve got them in academia. Let’s put them to work in Washington in an organized, watchdog fashion. Long-range issues in resolving the financial crisis COMMENTARY | September 268, 2008 Among the questions: Who exactly needs to be bailed out; are state pension funds damaged in your area; will programs be cut and taxes raised; will mortgages be modified so that people stay in their houses? How much will the Paulson package cost, and where’s the money coming from? ASK THIS | September 264, 2008 Martin Lobel notes that under Treasury secretary Henry M. Paulson’s proposal, all key decisions would be made by him or his designees and would not be reviewable. Shouldn’t that raise some questions? What’s the impact of the meltdown in your state? ASK THIS | September 261, 2008 Wall Street sold an enormous amount of doubtful derivatives to state pension funds. What happens now? Questions for McCain and Obama on the economic carnage ASK THIS | September 260, 2008 The candidates talk about protecting the middle class; how would they follow up? Would they, for example, continue to let multinational corporations shift their profits to tax havens abroad? Keep taxing income from labor at a higher rate than income from capital? Eliminate corporate subsidies? Of course lenders stopped lending. They’re not stupid. COMMENTARY | July 204, 2008 The problem with the economy is that the market worked. That’s a concept reporters and editors need to grasp. Change the economy? Change? How about some specifics? ASK THIS | June 163, 2008 It's time reporters got Obama and McCain to go beyond calls for 'change' and spell out their positions on deregulation, deficits, the plight of the middle class, taxes and energy. Why gas is almost $4 a gallon and some ideas on what to do about it COMMENTARY | May 122, 2008 Separating the real from wishful thinking on energy independence, short- and long-term oil price solutions, subsidies, speculation and government regulation. Republicans are conservative. Democrats are liberal. Got that? COMMENTARY | April 118, 2008 Conservatives are for getting the government off the backs of the people. Or is that, getting the people off the backs of the government? One of those two, anyway. And what is it again that liberals stand for? Why the economy is cratering: a guide for reporters COMMENTARY | January 24, 2008 Martin Lobel and D. Jeffrey Hirschberg break down and examine the components of the economy’s plunge and urge the press to take a hard look at how Congress and the Administration plan to deal with it. Have business reporters lost their souls? COMMENTARY | September 256, 2007 How did the business press miss the unraveling of the subprime mortgage market? Martin Lobel writes that news organizations cover business like a horse race these days -- and have forgotten that a vigilant concern for the lot of the little guy, for the greater good, and for economic justice is what leads to the most important financial journalism. Tax analyst sees press failure as partly to blame for looming economic crisis COMMENTARY | August 223, 2006 Martin Lobel, citing a Senate subcommittee report, notes a $40 billion to $70 billion evasion of taxes by the very wealthy. He anticipates a reduction in consumer spending and impaired bank lending. Q&A on Bush's energy proposals ASK THIS | April 117, 2006 Skyrocketing prices are seen, finally, as leading drivers to conserve some gas and reject SUVs. But no serious government action is expected until public outrage gets a good bit higher. What if there are no gains from reducing Mid-East oil imports? ASK THIS | February 39, 2006 Writers are skeptical that there would be any real benefits, doubt Bush’s motives and pose sharp questions for reporters to ask. What would work, they say, are higher gasoline taxes to restrain consumption. Lobbying reform – another approach COMMENTARY | February 35, 2006 The current disclosure act, dating to 1995, is designed to hide, not expose lobbying activity. It exempts many individuals and organizations. For starters, Martin Lobel writes, lobbying reform must disclose ‘who is doing what to whom.’ A tribute to three public figures who died in recent days COMMENTARY | December 355, 2005 Jack Anderson, Eugene McCarthy and William Proxmire set strong examples for the rest of us. Washington attorney Martin Lobel writes about the legacy of all three. Press seen as failing to deal with economic abuses COMMENTARY | October 274, 2005 Martin Lobel of 'Tax Analysts' rebukes he-said-she-said reporting; lists areas needing improvement and heads a group that tries to provide help and direction for the news media |
|
© 2024 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College
