Explore Harvard's Nieman network Nieman Fellowships Nieman Lab Nieman Reports Nieman Storyboard
Supporters and opponents of health care reform at the Supreme Court in Washington on March 27. (AP photo)

What’s lost if the Supreme Court kills the health care reform act?

COMMENTARY | March 29, 2012

Medicare advocate Judith Stein, dealing with the substance of the Affordable Care Act and not the politics, describes how millions of Americans of all ages already have benefited from health care reform. She urges the press to do a better job telling this part of the story – now and after the court decision. (Editor’s note: John Roberts and Anthony Kennedy, please read.)

By Judith Stein

It has been two years since President Obama signed the landmark Affordable Care Act (ACA) into law on March 23, 2010. When (or if) fully implemented, ACA will provide access to health insurance for virtually all Americans. It already has improved care for millions, reduced costs and helped many families gain access that was previously unavailable for them. Yet even as this progress continues its future is in serious jeopardy. The law is threatened by lawsuits, including, most ominously, those before the Supreme Court, as well as by myriad bills in Congress and threats by Republicans to repeal it. 
This article primarily reviews how ACA strengthens and improves Medicare. It then considers other significant improvements the law has made, aside from Medicare, expanding access and promoting policies that improve the health care system in general. What I am describing are many beneficial provisions that will be lost if the law is overturned by the Supreme Court or repealed by Congress. Too often, it seems to me, press focus has been on the politics of the health care debate and not the substance. Here for reporters and editors is a look at the substance.
Improving and Protecting Medicare
The reforms are saving older and disabled Americans thousands of dollars a year and strengthen the solvency of the Medicare program. Here is how: 
  • Reducing Costs for Prescription Drugs. People with Medicare are already benefiting from the phase-out of the "Donut Hole" coverage gap that required Medicare Part D enrollees to pay the full price for their drugs after a certain threshold of coverage has been met and until a catastrophic limit has been met. Beneficiaries now pay only 50 percent of the cost of brand name drugs in the Donut Hole and 86 percent of the cost of generic drugs, sharp reductions. ACA is on track to fully eliminate the Donut Hole by 2020, ensuring people enrolled in Part D plans have better access to the drugs they need.
  • Improving Accountability of Medicare Advantage (MA) Plans and Reimbursing Them More Fairly. Pursuant to the law, Medicare Advantage payments were restructured to better match payment in traditional Medicare. Prior to the restructuring, MA payments were, on average, 13 percent higher than those for traditional Medicare,  with insurance companies getting that much of a subsidy from the government. (Opponents criticize Obama for cuts in Medicare but this is where they have been applied – to the private insurance companies that siphon great numbers of enrollees from traditional Medicare.) MA plans now are prohibited from charging higher cost-sharing than traditional Medicare for skilled nursing facility care, chemotherapy and kidney dialysis. Further, MA plans are required to spend a specific percentage of premiums on actual coverage rather than on administration, marketing or profits.
  • Saving Lives with Preventive Health Services for Medicare Recipients. ACA makes many preventive screenings and services free for people with Medicare. It also added an annual Wellness Visit, all at no cost to the beneficiary.  
The biggest threats to Medicare are attempts to privatize and undermine the community of people who rely on Medicare for their health care. Ironically, these proposals are generally advanced by the same individuals who decry health care reform and argue that it hurts Medicare and its beneficiaries.
Expanding Access to Health Care, Aside from Medicare 
The Act makes great strides in ensuring that Americans can get and afford the coverage and care they need for themselves and their families. It ends harmful and discriminatory practices that left many people uninsured, especially when they needed care most. Policies already, or soon-to-be, in effect include: 
  • Better Coverage for Children. Since 2010, ACA has prohibited plans from refusing coverage to children with pre-existing conditions and has increased access under a parent’s plan to adult children up to age 26. The increase in coverage age to 26 is particularly important given the high unemployment rate and the limited number of jobs offering health insurance. Thanks to ACA, the uninsured rate for young adults has dropped over 27 percent and 2.5 million more young adults have health insurance. 
  • Saving Lives with Preventive Health Services. The law requires new health plans to provide coverage without cost-sharing for preventive services rated as A or B by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Patients can now receive certain services including mammograms, colonoscopy screenings for colon cancer, and some vaccinations at no cost. To date, over 54 million Americans with private insurance have been provided at least one free preventive service thanks to ACA, ensuring that health and wellness is prioritized and helping reduce costs for families and state and federal budgets. 
  • Removing Lifetime Limits. ACA outlaws the practice of placing lifetime limits on the dollar value of coverage or rescinding coverage (except in cases of fraud) for consumers.
  • Covering Pre-existing Conditions. Every state has a plan, operated by either the state or the federal government, to insure individuals who have been uninsured for at least six months due to a pre-existing condition. In 2011, the federal government eased rules for the plans it operates in 23 states and the District of Columbia, ensuring that even more Americans who have been unjustly denied coverage due to a Pre-Existing Condition now have access to care. More than 50,000 Americans now have coverage through the Pre-existing Condition Insurance Plan (PCIP) program, and will continue to enjoy access to care once ACA is fully implemented in 2014. 
  • Making Plans Easier to Understand for Consumers. Starting this September, ACA requires all health plans to provide consumers with concise, easy to understand summaries of coverage and glossaries of terms. As a tool that enhances informed decision-making, this change will better enable consumers to navigate the confusing process of shopping for and comparing plans. Health plans will also have to provide examples of coverage and estimates of out-of-pocket costs for common situations such as maternity or managing diabetes. 
  • Protecting Consumer Dollars, Not Corporate Profits. ACA requires insurance plans to provide real value. The law establishes a Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) to ensure that consumers' premium money is spent on care, not administrative costs or profits. If insurance companies fail to spend at least 80 percent of consumers' dollars on medical care and improving quality of care and services provided, they will be required under ACA to issue rebate checks to consumers.  
  • Expanding Coverage for Childless Adults through Medicaid. The law creates a state option to expand coverage to childless adults with incomes up to 133 percent of the Federal Poverty limits (about $15,000 a year for one person). This coverage will be required beginning in 2014, giving many Americans access to affordable care. It is to be paid for by the federal government for three years; after that the federal government will pay approximately 90 percent of the costs.  
Improving Care and Reducing Costs
ACA works to improve and explore new delivery systems and policies that will improve quality, make the system more efficient, and reduce costs. Among these efforts are: 
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research. The law authorized a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to conduct research into the comparative effectiveness of various medical interventions.
  • The Office for Dual Eligibles. This office, now called the Medicare and Medicaid Coordinating Office, was established to improve care for those Medicare beneficiaries who also have Medicaid and to promote more efficient and cost-effective methods for the provision of care. In its two years of operation, it has launched an alignment initiative to identify and address those areas where differences in Medicare and Medicaid law create problems for beneficiaries. It has also promoted the development of integrated care initiatives by states, to more effectively coordinate and manage care for dual eligibles. More than 20 states are engaged in the initiative at various levels of development.
  • Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation. The law established the Center, with authority to test innovative payment and delivery systems that improve outcomes and decrease costs, or improve outcomes without increasing costs, or decrease costs without worsening outcomes. The Innovation Center has collaborated closely with the Medicare and Medicaid Coordinating Office (mentioned above) to test models for improving care for dual eligibles.
  • Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) in Medicare. This provision, applicable to the traditional Medicare program, allows physicians and hospitals to organize with other health care professionals into voluntary organizations that can share with Medicare in savings generated from caring for certain Medicare beneficiaries if the ACOs meet designated quality standards.  
  • Medicare Value-Based Purchasing. Beginning October 1, 2012, Medicare is to pay hospitals based on their performance on certain quality measures and move toward making such payments applicable to skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, and ambulatory surgical centers.
  • Data Collection to Reduce Health Care Disparities. Effective March 23, 2012, ACA requires the collection and reporting of certain data on race, ethnicity, sex, primary language, and disability status. The data collection and disaggregation will help address and reduce disparities faced by communities including lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Americans. 
The Affordable Care Act expanded access to health care and improved the lives of the millions of Americans and their families who count on Medicare. The law ensures that future generations will have access to benefits by strengthening the Medicare Trust Fund and by supporting delivery system reforms that will help reduce the growth in health care costs. ACA promotes health and wellness for beneficiaries by emphasizing prevention, quality, and care coordination. Health care reform also benefits the families of Medicare beneficiaries by extending access to health insurance coverage to millions of uninsured individuals, and by protecting everyone against insurance company practices that deny health insurance coverage to people when they need it.
Efforts to eliminate ACA and to privatize Medicare endanger the lives of many, particularly in the current environment of fragmented health care delivery, ever-rising health care costs, and increased unemployment and job insecurities. Further proposals to shift more costs to Medicare beneficiaries through privatization would leave more people vulnerable and eliminate a true community Medicare program. 
The Affordable Care Act is good for Medicare, consumers, families, and taxpayers. As noted, millions have benefited from it already. It would be a tragedy for the Supreme Court to strike it down. If it should, it’s the role of the press to tell the story of what will have been lost, and not just focus on the politics. And it wouldn’t hurt to begin telling that story in advance of the court’s ruling.

Posted by Mark
03/29/2012, 05:27 PM

Sad, beyond words.

Posted by Richard
03/29/2012, 07:21 PM

This whole thing is very politically charged. What the GOP doesn't realize yet is that if the PPACA is
over turned, those who will get burned are those who are saving already on prescription costs, etc..
And when it comes voting time people vote with their pocketbooks (or not vote out of disgust). This has the potential of really backfiring on the GOP.

Posted by
04/07/2012, 09:12 AM

Ms. Stein , to her credit, was a staunch of single payer. Let's never forget: the ACA is vastly inferior to ANYTHING her organization proposed.

judith Stein in 2009:

"The inevitable conclusion is that any reasonable approach to health care reform must include, at the very least, a public option."

http://cmahealthpolicy.com/2009/05/22/the-indispen ...

The NiemanWatchdog.org website is no longer being updated. Watchdog stories have a new home in Nieman Reports.